<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">


<channel>
	<title><![CDATA[King Kong the blog]]></title>
	<description><![CDATA[Look Towards the World in The Cage, World in The Eyes of King kong]]></description>
	<link>http://kingkongtheblog.mysinablog.com</link>

<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:56:05 +0800</lastBuildDate>

<generator>mysinablog-2.0</generator>




<item>
<title><![CDATA[Emotional Quotient]]></title>

	<description><![CDATA[<font size="”4”"><b><p>Origins of the concept</font></b>
<font size="”3”"><p> The most distant roots of Emotional intelligence can be traced back to Darwin’s early work on the importance of emotional expression for survival and second adaptation. In the 1900s, even though traditional definitions of intelligence emphasized cognitive aspects such as memory and problem-solving, several influential researchers in the intelligence field of study had begun to recognize the importance of the non-cognitive aspects. For instance, as early as 1920, E. L. Thorndike, used the term social intelligence to describe the skill of understanding and managing other people. 
Similarly, in 1940 David Wechsler described the influence of non-intellective factors on intelligent behavior, and further argued that our models of intelligence would not be complete until we can adequately describe these factors. In 1983, Howard Gardner's Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences  introduced the idea of Multiple Intelligences which included both Interpersonal intelligence (the capacity to understand the intentions, motivations and desires of other people) and Intrapersonal intelligence (the capacity to understand oneself, to appreciate one's feelings, fears and motivations). In Gardner's view, traditional types of intelligence, such as IQ, fail to fully explain cognitive ability. Thus, even though the names given to the concept varied, there was a common belief that traditional definitions of intelligence are lacking in ability to fully explain performance outcomes.</font></p><p><a href="http://kingkongtheblog.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1281655" target="_blank">(閱讀全文)</a></p>]]></description>

<link>http://kingkongtheblog.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1281655</link>
<comments>http://kingkongtheblog.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1281655</comments>
<guid>http://kingkongtheblog.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&amp;articleId=1281655</guid>

<dc:creator><![CDATA[kingkongtheblog]]></dc:creator>

			<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
	
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:56:05 +0800</pubDate>

	<source url="http://kingkongtheblog.mysinablog.com/rss.php"><![CDATA[King Kong the blog]]></source>

</item>

</channel>
</rss>